Ocean Tomo Ratings™ Headlines

SEPTEMBER 12, 2013

Ocean Tomo Ratings System featured in ASE, SAS listed as top high-tech companies in US patent value

SEPTEMBER 9, 2013

Ocean Tomo Ratings System featured in Listed companies in Taiwan U.S. Patent Value 50

MAY 23, 2011

Lee & Hayes Press Release featured Patent Quality Report by Ocean Tomo PatentRatings

May 12, 2011

Ocean Tomo PatentRatings® Patent Quality Inventor Study featured on Patent Docs blog, Ocean Tomo Study Highlights Importance of Patents and Inventors to Corporate Value

April 7, 2010

IAM magazine & blog article, "The US's top law firms for patent quality"

March/April 2010
February 9, 2010

The Motley Fool article, “Do Patents Lead to Profits?

February 7, 2010

IAM Blog article, “Which US law firms secure the best quality patents for their clients?

February 1, 2010

Bloomberg BusinessWeek article, “Acacia: The Company Tech Loves to Hate

January 16, 2010

IAM Blog article, “It depends on what you mean by valuable…

January 14, 2010

The 271 Patent Blog article, “Patent Portfolios: More Value, Less Volume?

January 13, 2010
January 9, 2010

TechCrunch article, “When to Take on Facebook, American Idol or Virgin Mobile in an IP Fight

-----------------------
All data accessible through OceanTomo.com/ratings was prepared by Ocean Tomo based on proprietary algorithms and other statistical information provided by PatentRatings, LLC. All scores, ratings and ranks are statistical in nature and are based on publicly available data. They are not based on, nor do they consider any legal opinions or other professional opinions, advice or other information (public or otherwise) that may have bearing on the subject matter of the analysis. No direct statistical correlation has been established between IPQ scores and "fair market value," royalty rates, validity, enforceability or infringement and IPQ scores should not be relied upon to prove or establish the existence or probability of such facts. No direct statistical correlation has been established between Relevance scores and patentability or materiality, and Relevance scores should not be relied upon to prove, establish or support any opinion of the materiality or patentability of one patent in view of another. Some of the information and services provided by this website may be covered by one or more of the following U.S. patents: 6,556,992; 7,657,476; 7,716,226; and other patents pending. Copyright 2001-2010 PatentRatings, LLC. Copyright 2011 Ocean Tomo, LLC. All rights reserved.

OCEANTOMO.COM/RATINGS DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY LEGAL ADVICE. NONE OF THE DATA, INFORMATION, ANALYSES OR REPRESENTATIONS THEREOF ACCESSIBLE THROUGH THIS SITE SHOULD BE CONSTRUED OR TAKEN AS LEGAL ADVICE

Ocean Tomo PatentRatings Legal